On the recordEvery fact sourced to a primary record·The standardAdvisors never pay for placement·IndependentA publication of AdvisorWorld.com Inc·VerificationCredentials checked with the issuing body·SourcingThe IRS, state departments of revenue, and the courts·CorrectionsWhen we're wrong, we fix the record and say so·On the recordEvery fact sourced to a primary record·The standardAdvisors never pay for placement·IndependentA publication of AdvisorWorld.com Inc·VerificationCredentials checked with the issuing body·SourcingThe IRS, state departments of revenue, and the courts·CorrectionsWhen we're wrong, we fix the record and say so·
Est. MMXXVI · Advertiser-freeAdvisors never pay for placement
T
The Trusted Advisor
Retirement & estate planning, on the recordEvery fact sourced · Every advisor verified
Trusts & ILITs · ILIT Cluster

Funding an ILIT: Annual Gifts, Split-Dollar, and the Seed Problem

An ILIT owns a policy, but it needs cash to pay the premiums — and you can’t simply write the insurer a check without undermining the whole structure. Money reaches the trust as gifts, and the art of funding is making those gifts qualify for the annual exclusion. Here is how the annual gift, gift-splitting, the seed, and split-dollar each fit.

Annual-exclusion gifting

The backbone of most ILIT funding is the annual gift-tax exclusion. It lets you give a set amount to each of any number of people every year with no gift tax and without touching your lifetime exemption. For 2026 the annual exclusion is $19,000 per recipient — unchanged from 2025 — as set by the IRS’s annual inflation adjustments (Rev. Proc. 2025-32; the figure is also listed on the IRS’s “What’s New — Estate and Gift Tax” page). The exclusion is indexed for inflation from a $10,000 statutory base (IRC § 2503(b)) and does not rise every year — it held flat at $19,000 into 2026.

The catch you already met: the annual exclusion only covers gifts of a present interest, and a plain gift to a trust is a future interest. The whole point of the Crummey mechanism is to convert each premium gift into a present interest so it fits inside the $19,000 exclusion. Funding and Crummey notices are two halves of the same annual routine.

Because the exclusion is per recipient, an ILIT with several beneficiaries holding withdrawal rights can absorb several multiples of $19,000 in exclusion-qualified gifts each year — often enough to cover a substantial premium without any gift tax or any use of the lifetime exemption.

Gift-splitting between spouses

A married couple can double the exclusion available for gifts to the trust. Under the gift-splitting election, a gift made by one spouse can be treated as made one-half by each — so a gift is covered by two annual exclusions instead of one (IRC § 2513). In 2026 that turns the effective exclusion into $38,000 per recipient for a consenting couple, even if only one spouse actually has the money.

Gift-splitting is not automatic. Both spouses must be U.S. citizens or residents, both must consent, and the election is made on a federal gift-tax return (Form 709). For a couple funding a larger premium, filing the return to elect splitting is routine — but it is a return that has to be filed, not a box you can skip.

The lump-sum seed

Sometimes annual gifts are not enough, or a trust needs money up front — to pay a first large premium, or to hold a reserve. A larger one-time contribution, a “seed,” can do that. A seed above the annual exclusion is a taxable gift: it does not create gift tax immediately (your lifetime exemption absorbs it), but it must be reported on a gift-tax return (Form 709), and it uses up part of the $15 million exemption you might otherwise leave for your estate.

One timing warning: if you pay gift tax on a large gift and die within three years, that gift tax is added back to your estate under the “gross-up rule” (IRC § 2035(b)). For most seed gifts no tax is actually paid — the exemption absorbs them — so the gross-up doesn’t bite. But it is a real edge case for very large gifts made late in life, and it connects funding back to the three-year rule.

Split-dollar for larger premiums

When a premium is large enough that annual-exclusion gifting can’t comfortably cover it, a split-dollar arrangement can share the cost between you (or your business) and the trust, rather than funding the whole premium with gifts. The tax treatment is governed by a detailed set of Treasury regulations that define two mutually exclusive regimes:

  • The economic-benefit regime — the party paying the premium is treated as providing the trust a measurable economic benefit each year, which is taxed (Treas. Reg. § 1.61-22).
  • The loan regime — the premium payments are treated as a series of loans to the trust, subject to below-market-interest rules (Treas. Reg. § 1.7872-15).

Split-dollar is powerful and genuinely complicated — the wrong structure can create the very tax it was meant to avoid. It belongs with a specialist, and this page’s job is only to tell you the regime exists and which regulations govern it, so you can ask about it by name.

The premium mechanics

Put together, the annual routine looks like this: you make a gift to the trust’s own bank account (kept separate from your money); the trustee sends the beneficiaries their Crummey notices; the withdrawal window runs and lapses; and the trustee pays the premium to the insurer from the trust account. The order matters — the money should reach the trust, and the notices should go out, before the trustee pays the premium, so that the present-interest treatment is clean. Doing it in the wrong order, or paying the insurer directly, is a common way to weaken the structure.

Sources & methodology

Methodology & sources

The 2026 annual exclusion of $19,000 is the figure the IRS publishes for calendar year 2026 in Revenue Procedure 2025-32 and on its “What’s New — Estate and Gift Tax” page; both are linked. It held flat from 2025 — a common drafting error is to assume it rose. Code and regulation citations link to Cornell’s Legal Information Institute, and Form 709 to its IRS page. This page is re-verified at least annually and on any change in law — see our editorial standards.

Educational only, not legal or tax advice; not yet reviewed by an outside attorney. When a licensed trust-and-estate attorney reviews this page, the reviewer will appear in the byline.

Last verified July 19, 2026.

Continue in the ILIT cluster

Sourced · Cited · Free
Start here

The ILIT, in English

What an ILIT actually does, who needs one after the $15 million exclusion, how it works end to end, what it costs, the alternatives — and when it is the wrong tool. Every legal claim cited to the statute, regulation, or case it comes from.

Primary-source citedVerified July 19, 202628 min
IRC §2035

The three-year rule

Gift an existing policy to an ILIT and die within three years, and the death benefit comes right back into your estate. Why a trust-purchased policy avoids the trap — and how a sale to the trust can too.

Primary-source citedVerified July 19, 202616 min
Crummey v. Commissioner

Crummey letters

The annual gift-tax exclusion only covers gifts of a present interest — and a gift to a trust normally isn't one. The withdrawal-right workaround, its notice hygiene, and the IRS's long campaign against it.

Primary-source citedVerified July 19, 202618 min
Framework, not a statistic

What it costs

Drafting fees, trustee fees, and the annual administration burden — presented as an honest framework of the cost drivers, not a fabricated national average, because no authoritative average exists.

Primary-source citedVerified July 19, 202613 min
Decanting · lapse · distribution

Unwinding an ILIT

Irrevocable is not the same as unchangeable. When the exclusion outgrows the estate, a marriage ends, or a policy underperforms, the exits are decanting, distribution, and letting the policy lapse — each cited to the statute.

Primary-source citedVerified July 19, 202615 min
The honest comparison

ILIT vs. alternatives

For most families under the $15 million exclusion, an ILIT is a solution to a problem they don't have. When simpler ownership is better, when it isn't, and where a SLAT fits — said plainly.

Primary-source citedVerified July 19, 202616 min